Woeful Farm Bill and Record Year Highlight Remarks by Secretary Conner
When Congress returns to session later this month, one of the pieces of business to finish is the reconciling of the House and Senate versions of the 2007 Farm Bill. Unfortunately, with the two versions suffering from some very fundamental differences, the outlook for a successful conference seems farfetched.
"With all that has gone into this process, it would be great to stand up here and be able to tell you that we were just a few short steps away from wrapping up a final package that we can deliver to the President for his signature," Acting Secretary of Agriculture Chuck Conner told the South Dakota Corn Growers Association. "Unfortunately, ladies and gentlemen, that is not where we are right now."
Both House and Senate versions of the bill propose tax increases to fund programs, something that doesn't sit well with the Department of Agriculture and hasn't been done since 1933. Conner called the Senate version of the bill "full of gimmicks" and "illusionary savings," saying that he did not believe other sectors of the economy should be asked to pay additional taxes to support farm programs. He also stated he was concerned about the "trade-distorting effects of increasing target prices and loan rates" that the two versions contain and that there is no inclusion of a meaningful income cap on farm program participation or reform of the way that beneficial interest is applied in marketing loan transactions. To make his point clear, he showed the audience a map of New York City where a lot of farm program payments are handed out, saying "this has to stop."
Conner and other senior agriculture officials will recommend that President Bush veto any Farm Bill that does not rectify any of the mentioned points of discontent.
"Every farm bill is tough; every farm bill looks bleak until the last minute," said Conner. "This one looks bleak from my vantage point; I will tell you that. But I know that on the other side of that is an opportunity for us to sit down and work together as we have done so many times in the past, come up with the right plan, a reform-minded plan, one that's fair to the taxpayers, one that talks about the true costs of the bill."
Though the Farm Bill is a flop, there was good news.
For U.S. farmers, 2007 was an outstanding year, economically speaking. Corn prices hit an 11-year high. Soybeans hit a 34-year high while wheat prices have been at all-time records. U.S. agricultural exports topped $82 billion with expectations that trade in 2008 will reach $91 billion, and the Department of Agriculture is estimating that net cash farm income will be at $85.7 billion, up $18 billion, by next July. It is also no secret that the 2007 Energy Bill signed by President Bush on December 19 will be a boon for farmers as it is asks for extraordinary increases in the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) over the next several years.
"I remember the days not too long ago when we gauged our year in agriculture by whether or not we broke $50 billion of net cash farm income," said Conner. "We have not only broken that, we are way beyond anything historically ever used as a benchmark of measurement."
Matthew Carr, NACM staff writer
Recent Comments